Artificial Intelligence is the idea of a man-made object having the capacity of human thought. There are separate parts to this idea. Some parts are being explored, some are being ignored.
The ideas that have advanced remarkably quickly are quantitative analysis, memory, and computation. In these cases, AI is already here. Computers, data storage, and calculators have been around and evolving for years. In the aspect of data gathering, manipulation, and transport, they have been in the forefront of the push towards artificial thought. Is this the limit of what we can build though?
The devices we currently use to push the boundaries of what we understand to be Artificial Intelligence are still based on a reactionary process programmed into the device. It gathers data, it acts on that data as it has been programmed to do. What we have accomplished is rather extraordinary, but again there are separate facets to intelligence and conscience.
One thing humans can do that still cannot be appropriately programmed is intuition. The ability to link ideas to memories, smells, visual input, or anything else our senses provide is a type of quantitative analysis, yet humans do it instinctually and if a program can do it, its all based on programming that reveals the true artificiality of the program. There is no instinctual leaps made by an artificial application.
The idea that humans can create a computer that could design another computer that is smarter than the original, in turn designing another of greater intelligence, and so forth should be a sobering thought. If you’ve watched the movies, you’ve seen the results. Or have you? Computer programs also lack another human tool, imagination.
Listening to an orchestra of seasoned musicians can be a nearly transcendent experience. Hearing the same piece played by a sophisticated computer, is still a beautiful piece of music, played to perfection. However, that piece seems less complete because something is missing. Creativity and imagination go hand-in-hand. A computer cannot truly achieve either.
Will True AI Exist?
What follows is opinion and conjecture, because no one can tell the future, not even AI.
The human mind can process thoughts, compute, imagine, conceive, dream, and a host of other things. It is truly a marvel in any sense. It is in that analysis, I think, that the truth comes out, that true AI can never exist. Programming is responses to interrogatives. The intellectual side of human thought is well adapted for AI. However, animal instincts and metaphysical conjecture are so far beyond, that it seems ludicrous to imagine AI ever getting there.
You’ve probably seem Terminator, The Matrix, iRobot, and many other AI doom cloud movies, or even read the thousands of more stories created by imaginative, non-AI brains. In what these stories present, the one thing true AI needs to achieve the futures described in those stories, is intent. This is another human quality that computers simply lack. They respond to stimuli. They do not have intent to do anything, unless they are programmed to do so. Even then, the intent is the programmer’s, not the device’s.
Is this saying that a future ruled by robots is out of the question? Maybe, but if technology takes control of the world, it will be the intent of the programmers that make it happen. For a computer to make the leap from completing programmed responses, to self-aware actions against those that programmed it is something that I don’t think is possible.
Is a computer self-aware? No. It responds to gathered data in a pre-ordained, programmed fashion, and at no time does it ever wonder, why it responds.
Should True AI Exist?
“One thing that is never talked about, is artificial wisdom.” -Bill Whittle
What is the intent of those trying to achieve Artificial Intelligence? Were it simply to create tools that allow humans to live their lives more efficiently, that would be great, but we’re already there.
In the examination of create a self-improving, self-engineering computer that advances itself past obsolescense, what is the intent of the programmers there? Is the intent just to create a tool that automatically improves itself and it’s processes, thereby making it even more beneficial for human use? If so, that tool would be a welcome addition to our lives, but it still wouldn’t be true AI.
If the intent of the programmers is to create beings with self-aware thoought processes and all the other amazing things humans can do, than it could be defined then that the programmers want to be God. That is what lies beneath everything within the idea of Artificial Intelligence. These extremely smart people want to be God, or at least God-like. The product of their work, therefore, is immaterial, for the flaw in their designs are within themselves, not their work.
The truest question in Artificial Intelligence is not, “Can we do it?”
The truest question is “Should we do it?”
Considering what human minds are capable of and where the AI groundbreakers are headed, I believe the answer to both those questions, is a simple, no.